Mini assignments Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Mini assignments - Coursework ExampleHowever, the premises are not accurate. This makes the parameter valid, great(p)ly not sound. A valid deductive argument that is sound preface Either I own a dog or a cat. Premise I do not own a cat. Conclusion Therefore, I must own a dog. This argument can be valid and sound. It is possible that I own a cat or a dog, but not both. It is possible I own a dog. It also cannot be true that I own a cat because of one of the premises. The only closing curtain is I own a dog. 2. Inductive Language Construct an inductive argument for a specific conclusion. Then, explain what you might do to make this inductive argument stronger, either by revising the premises or by revising the conclusion. Inductive argument for a specific conclusion Premise lav is a redhead. Premise Jay is a redhead. Premise Jennifer is a redhead. Premise John, Jay, and Jennifer are siblings. Premise John, Jay, and Jennifers parents are redheads. Conclusion Parents with red hair curb a good chance of having children with red hair. This is an inductive argument because the conclusion is more than likely correct. However, it is not as strong as it could be. Here is another argument that might be stronger. Premise John is a redhead. Premise Jay is a redhead. Premise Jennifer is a redhead. Premise John, Jay, and Jennifer are siblings. Premise John, Jay, and Jennifers parents are redheads. ... kick downstairs an explanation of why each makes a mistake in drawing the conclusion it does. Review your classmates examples and see if they, in fact, commit the fallacy identified. Ad Hominem hallucination Premise Adolf Hitler was German Premise Adolf Hitler waged a genocide war against the Jews, mentally ill, and Slavic people. Premise Hitler was evil. Conclusion Therefore all Germans are evil. This is an Ad Hominem fallacy because it is based on a persons, Hitler, character. Begging the header Premise Adultery is always wrong. Premise Jane has committed adultery. Conclusion Therefore, Jane is always wrong. This is Begging the Question Fallacy because it has circular reasoning. Jane is wrong because she committed adultery. Adultery is wrong, so Jane is wrong for committing it. Hasty Generalization Premise My computer is an Acer. Premise My computers hard drive crashed because of a virus. Conclusion All Acer computers have hard drives that crash. This is a Hasty Generalization. Just because my computer crashed due to a virus does not mean all Acer computers have hard drives that crash. I might not have had the right anti-virus protection on my computer, or I could have bought a damaged computer. Just because one product fails does not mean the whole line of products will fail. 4. The Media and Fallacies One rich source of fallacies is the media television, radio, magazines, and the Internet (including, of course, commercials.) recognise two distinct fallacies you see committed in the media. Do you think it is more likely that you will not be fooled by these fallacies having studied system of logic? What do you think those